![]() |
|
|
Browse by Region
|
DRC: ICC outreach in DRC; A Congolese deputy is planning to appeal
10 Apr 2008
Dear Colleagues,
Please find below information on recent developments related to the International Criminal Court's investigation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This digest includes two press releases related to ICC outreach efforts in the DRC, articles on a political-spiritual movement that is trying to enlist the ICC in a case against the government, and finally, an editorial piece on the difficulties of international justice. Please take note of the Coalition's policy on situations before the ICC (below), which explicitly states that the CICC will not take a position on potential and current situations before the Court or situations under analysis. The Coalition, however, will continue to provide the most up-to-date information about the ICC. Special thanks to Shelly Sayagh for helping translating those articles. Regards, Linda Gueye CICC Communication Section [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ I. ICC OUTREACH IN DRC i. "The ICC Organizes Outreach Sesions for Police Officers in Bunia," ICC Press Release, The Hague, 2 April 2008, http://www.icc-cpi.int/press/pressreleases/353.html "From 24 to 25 March 2008, the International Criminal Court (ICC) organized outreach sessions for police officers from the Bunia garrison. Close to 300 police officers, including police judiciary officers, attended the sessions. The Chief Inspector and all his superintendents also attended these sessions organized to increase their knowledge of the ICC. Special emphasis was laid on crimes that fall within the jurisdiction of the Court and on the general principles of individual criminal responsibility... It was the first time that these police officers, many of whom fought in militias before joining the national police force, were attending such outreach sessions on the ICC. Most of their questions focused on the principle of complementarity and victim reparations and compensation. The participants manifested a clear interest in the ICC and requested the organization of more outreach activities that specially target women and youths to discourage them - especially the latter - from joining the militias that are still active in the region. To that end, they agreed to continue supporting ICC outreach activities and urged the Outreach Unit to continue its efforts of engaging in direct dialogue with local communities." ii. "The ICC conducts outreach in Bogoro, DRC," ICC Press Release, The Hague, 3 April 2008, http://www.icc-cpi.int/press/pressreleases/354.html&l=en "On 29 March 2008, the International Criminal Court organized an outreach session for the affected communities of Bogoro in Ituri. This meeting was the first exchange of information between the Court and the inhabitants of this village, which was the alleged theatre of violent clashes between various armed groups in 2002 and 2003. The participants, an estimated 112 people, were mostly composed of fishermen, livestock breeders, farmers, teachers, students and traditional chiefs. The message disseminated included general information about the Court, but also information on the two ongoing cases. At the end of the presentation, the participants wished to know whether other militia leaders in Ituri would be prosecuted. Other questions were put about victim participation and the rebuilding of infrastructure destroyed during the war. Lastly, the participants expressed the fervent hope that they would be able to see live the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, which will commence on 23 June..." II. CONGOLESE DEPUTY DECIDES TO APPEAL TO THE ICC BUT ICC MAY NOT TAKE ON THE BDK QUESTION i. "Congo-Kinshasa: BDK Against the Government, the ICC will decide!," La Prospérité, 8 April, 2008, http://fr.allafrica.com/stories/200804080148.html (in French) "The conflict between the Government of the DRC to political-religious movement Bundu dia Kongo (BDK) takes a new turn. Ne Mwanda Nsemi, spiritual leader of BDK, has decided to take advantage of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations. He accuses the Government of turning a blind eye or of encouraging, in its own words, the massacres of the people of Bas-Congo. ...According to him, the army continues to kill in the areas of Kibanza, Kenge and Munguluwala to Luozi. ...These are serious accusations made by Ne Mwanda Nsemi against the Government.... While observers were wondering about their chances of seeing the end result of the steps Ne Mwanda Nsemi took, the Alliance for the Presidential Majority (AMP), the Head of State's political party, made known its position on the development of this case. For the executive secretary of the AMP, Koya Gialo, a former governor of Katanga who was in power at the time of the Lubumbashi massacres, Ne Mwanda Nsemi's approach is completely unfounded. He contends that condemning the Government is out of the question. And that the International Criminal Court can only be seized upon when national courts do nothing. However, in the case of Bas-Congo, the national courts have been seized of this matter, the magistrates have taken on the Bas-Congo file. According Koya Gialo, the question is a matter for the judiciary. The ICC will not be able to take up the BDK issue. " Translation is unofficial and provided by CICC Secretariat. ii. "Review of the Congolese Press for Tuesday, 8 April 2008" http://www.digitalcongo.net/article/50782 (in French) "...Forum des As [Ace's Forum, a Congolese newspaper] signals that under the referral procedure, Ne Mwanda Nsemi's approach poses a problem for the ICC. At a time when it was believed that the Bundu dia Kongo case was closed with Recommendations from the National Assembly, here Mwanda Nsemi returned to the charge by deciding to solicit the International Criminal Court against the DRC on the grounds that the killings would continue against his followers in the Bas-Congo. 'But, with respect to the process,' said the colleague who cites sources close to the International Criminal Court (ICC), 'BDK's approach poses a serious problem in terms of bringing this international judicial institution to taken on this case. The problem would lie in the procedure or the conditions to be met in order to convince the ICC Prosecutor..." Translation is unofficial and provided by CICC Secretariat. III. OP-ED "The Difficult International Justice" by Gil Courtemanche, Le Devoir, 6 and 7 April 2008, http://www.wikio.fr/international/justice_internationale/cour_penale_internation /ale?wfid=51904048 (in French) "I am settling for a long time in this small, monotonous and bourgeois town in order to familiarize myself with international justice, and then describe it. ...The first trial of this body, put in place by the United Nations in 2002, will begin on June 23. It is the trial of Thomas Lubanga, a militia leader accused of recruiting child soldiers in the Democratic Republic of Congo. With respect to this justice that moves in and transgresses borders and national sovereignties, I have always hesitated between skepticism and idealism. ...Communities need their own government so long governments as these governments ensure the safety and the welfare of their citizens. In contrast, the history of the last 100 years pleads in favor of a richly endowed international justice, one that is efficient and exemplary. The first experiences of international justice were certainly not exemplary. ...Bosnia and Rwanda forced us to revise our concept of justice of the people and add to the crimes of nations those committed by militias, civil wars or ethnic cleansing. If the Special Tribunal on Rwanda was exemplary in terms of the pursuit of justice, it was not so in terms of efficiency. On the other hand, the Special Tribunal for Yugoslavia will bring a new dimension to justice: the emergence of victims as part of the judicial process. This is a huge step in the fight against impunity that is still ravaging Africa: proof that even the smallest person can unbolt from his stature the most powerful of dictators or the most terrifying of torturers with his/her testimony. Generally speaking, most of the criticisms that have been made are of two orders: international justice is slow and does not judge the big fish. This last statement should be qualified. After all, Milosevic was the first head of state to appear before the justice of mankind, and today, in The Hague, the trial of the former president of Liberia, Charles Taylor is still ongoing. But, in effect, in the case of the Democratic Republic of Congo, which led to the arrest of two militia leaders by the ICC, their commanders, the Presidents Museveni of Uganda and Kagame of Rwanda, will not face justice. We can nonetheless hope that these trials of 'small fish' will help to establish the criminal responsibility of those 'big fish' in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Ituri province..." Translation is unofficial and provided by CICC Secretariat. ********************************** CICC's policy on the referral and prosecution of situations before the ICC: The Coalition for the ICC is not an organ of the Court. The CICC is an independent NGO movement dedicated to the establishment of the International Criminal Court as a fair, effective, and independent international organization. The Coalition will continue to provide the most up-to-date information about the ICC and to help coordinate global action to effectively implement the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Coalition will also endeavor to respond to basic queries and to raise awareness about the ICC's trigger mechanisms and procedures, as they develop. The Coalition as a whole, and its secretariat, do not endorse or promote specific investigations or prosecutions or take a position on situations (potential and current), or situations under analysis before the ICC. However, individual CICC members may endorse referrals, provide legal and other support on investigations, or develop partnerships with local and other organizations in the course of their efforts. Communications to the ICC can be sent to: ICC P.O. Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands |
|
|